In-store has opentelemetry but the semantic conventions are the data model and deserve their own entry.
Compiled for the API Evangelist data model catalog, then confirmed against the steward's own site.
Evidence: name evidence 3/3. Found something wrong? Tell me — corrections are cheap and I would rather be right.
Not enough of this standard was readable to place it in a band. That is a limit of what I could see, not a finding against the standard.
A separate measure from the Kin Score,
which rates API providers. This rates how current a standard is in how it is
expressed, published and paid for — not how good it is. EDIFACT and
X12 score low here and move an enormous share of world trade.
Licence evidence: CNCF projects publish specifications openly.
