I have not written this one up yet, and I would rather leave it blank than put words in the steward's mouth. The entry is verified and the facts in the sidebar are confirmed — the reading is still to come.
Compiled for the API Evangelist data model catalog, then confirmed against the steward's own site.
Evidence: name evidence 5/5. Found something wrong? Tell me — corrections are cheap and I would rather be right.
Not enough of this standard was readable to place it in a band. That is a limit of what I could see, not a finding against the standard.
A separate measure from the Kin Score, which rates API providers. This rates how current a standard is in how it is expressed, published and paid for — not how good it is. EDIFACT and X12 score low here and move an enormous share of world trade.
